<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fligtar&#039;s blog &#187; techcrunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fligtar.com/tag/techcrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fligtar.com</link>
	<description>a boombox is not a toy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:51:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody&#8217;s Perfect</title>
		<link>http://blog.fligtar.com/2009/12/10/nobodys-perfect/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fligtar.com/2009/12/10/nobodys-perfect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Scott (fligtar)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[add-ons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planet.mozilla.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jetpack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fligtar.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article from TechCrunch was published this morning about Google Chrome&#8217;s new extensions platform. I&#8217;m very excited to see so much talk about add-ons recently, and Chrome&#8217;s extension support shows how important browser customization is. I&#8217;ve been experimenting with Chrome extensions and plan on posting my thoughts on the experience soon, but the TechCrunch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/10/chrome-firefox/">interesting article</a> from <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com">TechCrunch</a> was published this morning about Google Chrome&#8217;s new extensions platform. I&#8217;m very excited to see so much talk about add-ons recently, and Chrome&#8217;s extension support shows how important browser customization is.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been experimenting with Chrome extensions and plan on posting my thoughts on the experience soon, but the TechCrunch article caught me by surprise with some of its statements that I wanted to comment on sooner.</p>
<p>Most notable was the comparison of the Chrome extensions platform to Firefox&#8217;s current add-ons platform without a single mention of the Mozilla Labs <a href="http://jetpack.mozillalabs.com">Jetpack project</a>. Jetpack is an experimentation into what the future of Firefox add-ons might look like using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. These add-ons are installed without a browser restart, are automatically up-to-date, and also appear instantaneously in the <a href="http://jetpackgallery.mozillalabs.com/">Jetpack Gallery</a>. And it&#8217;s very easy to write a useful Jetpack extension in just a couple minutes that even works on Mac.</p>
<p><span id="more-768"></span>As Chrome&#8217;s extension support is in <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/google-chrome-for-holidays-mac-linux.html">beta</a>, I think using our experimental Jetpack platform as the point of comparison would have been fairer.</p>
<p>I was also surprised to see the Chrome extensions gallery characterized as &#8220;much more open&#8221; with the recent news that Google is <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/12/04/google-chrome-extension-gallery-treads-lightly-on-copyright-issu/">rejecting extensions</a> that, in its opinion, take browser customization a bit too far on its properties. Being open is a <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/about/manifesto.en.html">pretty big deal</a> to Mozilla, so it&#8217;s disappointing to see the TechCrunch author feels we lost on that one. The <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com">Download Squad</a> article takes a different view on Chrome extensions:</p>
<blockquote class="quote"><p>
Unlike Mozilla&#8217;s add-on site for Firefox, it appears as though things are going to run in a slightly more Apple-esque fashion.<br />
<cite>&mdash; Lee Matthews, <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/12/04/google-chrome-extension-gallery-treads-lightly-on-copyright-issu/">Download Squad</a><time datetime="2009-12-04">December 4, 2009</time></cite>
</p></blockquote>
<p>This has been an incredible week for the add-on development world with the launch of the Chrome extensions gallery on Tuesday, their event on Wednesday, our meetup at Mozilla tonight, and <a href="http://www.addoncon.com">Add-on-Con</a> tomorrow. I&#8217;m glad that the Chrome team learned from the existing Firefox add-ons platform and made many of the same improvements we have with Jetpack, and I look forward to seeing where the two of us take the next generation of add-ons, because no one has &#8220;perfected browser extensions&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fligtar.com/2009/12/10/nobodys-perfect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TechCrunch: enough with the Twitter posts</title>
		<link>http://blog.fligtar.com/2009/06/26/techcrunch-enough-with-the-twitter-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fligtar.com/2009/06/26/techcrunch-enough-with-the-twitter-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Scott (fligtar)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sadface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fligtar.com/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Twitter. I really do. I like TechCrunch too, and have been subscribing to their posts for years now. But I can&#8217;t stand the barrage of Twitter-related posts over the last few months. I decided to take a look at how many posts per day over the last 3 months have been related to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>. I really do. I like <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com">TechCrunch</a> too, and have been subscribing to their posts for years now. But I can&#8217;t stand the barrage of Twitter-related posts over the last few months. I decided to take a look at how many posts per day over the last 3 months have been related to Twitter using <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/twitter/posts">this handy CrunchBase page</a>. My findings are below:</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.fligtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/twittercrunch.png" alt="Graph of TechCrunch Twitter posts per day" /></p>
<p>There are many blogs out there that are dedicated to covering one service. They usually make that pretty clear in their name. But I think it&#8217;s ridiculous for TechCrunch to have 8 posts in a single day related to Twitter (as they did yesterday) and to have only 2-3 days per month where they DON&#8217;T talk about Twitter. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/16/i-will-not-post-that-twitter-is-down-i-will-not-post-that-twitter-is-down-i-will/">Twitter being down</a> <strong>is not news</strong>. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/25/its-kill-feature-time-again-at-twitter-to-stay-up/">Twitter disabling search for a few hours</a> <strong>is not news</strong>.</p>
<p>I was satisfied just leaving a short comment to this effect on the latest Twitter post, but after doing the brief post count research above and realizing how long I&#8217;ve tolerated this for, I&#8217;m no longer a TechCrunch reader. If they ever reduce the number of Twitter posts or perhaps split the mind-numbing posts off into TweetCrunch, I&#8217;ll be glad to hit the subscribe button again.</p>
<p>And like I said: I actually like Twitter. It&#8217;s gotta suck even more for the people that don&#8217;t care for Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fligtar.com/2009/06/26/techcrunch-enough-with-the-twitter-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
